Teaching homosexuality in our schools

by Warren Throckmorton                                                                      Vol. XVIII, No. 6, June/July 2005

Students are approaching the final days of this educational year, but increasingly parents are heading back to school. While many students will soon be thinking of summer jobs, others – such as administrators, teachers and parents – will not be getting a break. Controversies involving schools and social issues will be keeping the adults busy for the foreseeable future.

It seems weekly a new situation arises where schools are the centers of controversy over what to teach regarding sexuality and homosexuality. Here is a sampling of the most recent situations:

– Two parent groups in Montgomery County, MD, sued the school board over a proposed health education curriculum partially based on resources provided by homosexual advocacy groups. The curriculum and accompanying resources were so biased that a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order to halt the implementation of the changes. The order recently was continued until December 2005.

– One of the groups involved in the Montgomery County lawsuit recently was rejected in its bid to exhibit its literature at the national convention of the National Parent-Teacher Association (PTA).

The rejected group, Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays (PFOX), is crying foul because a comparable group, the Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG), was allowed to exhibit at no cost last year and is back again this year. At least one of the state PTA associations is not happy. The Mississippi chapter of the PTA is supporting the right of PFOX to be at the national convention.

– The Iowa State Board of Education will soon determine if the Pleasant Valley (Iowa) School Board was correct to limit a pro-homosexuality children’s book to the middle school. After a father complained, the school board voted 4-3 to remove The Misfits by James Howe from the elementary school as a read aloud book. The author of the book has said publicly that he had wanted to write The Misfits with a homosexual character in order to change beliefs concerning homosexuality.

– In Massachusetts, a father was arrested because he refused to leave his son’s elementary school until the principal agreed to follow Massachusetts parental notification law concerning sexual content in instruction. The father, David Parker, wanted to introduce the subject of homosexuality to his 6 year old rather have the school do it for him. Schools officials declined to notify the father as required by law and provided books to kindergarten students that portrayed homosexual couples alongside heterosexual couples.

What are we to make of these eruptions of controversy?

The educational establishment, as represented by the National Education Association, would have us believe these parents are closed-minded or maybe even uncaring.

What baffles me is how groups like the NEA and PTA can miss the significance of these parental uprisings. In states both blue and red, mainstream parents are becoming organized in unprecedented ways to express frustration over how homosexuality is being taught to children from kindergarten to high school. The mantra recited by the educational establishment comes off sounding like a feeble attempt at a Jedi mind trick – ‘What we teach about homosexuality is none of your concern; you want safe schools don’t you?’ Waving the club of tolerance, the educational establishment smugly proceeds to denigrate one set of beliefs regarding homosexuality in order to promote another.

Parents such as those who brought suit in Maryland are offended by the continual specter of unsafe schools raised by the educational establishment. Are schools unsafe because of traditional beliefs concerning homosexuality? Where is the research to that effect? The school system has produced no evidence.

Mainstream parents appear to be fed up with being told that their values and beliefs are intolerant, homophobic and even worse, responsible for the bullying of children.

If the educational establishment does not make some moves to ensure moral neutrality in instruction, I predict we will see lawsuits such as Montgomery County’s case replicated throughout the land.

In short, more parents will be coming back to school. [BP]

[Warren Throckmorton is associate professor of psychology and director of college counseling at Grove City College, a Christian college in Pennsylvania.]

[Editorial Note: The above article is valuable in that it documents a representative sampling of pro-homosexual attitudes and actions in government schools. But I see a serious flaw in the penultimate paragraph: Should Christian parents really seek “moral neutrality” in their children’s education?

          Moral neutrality assumes there is no absolute right and wrong. To accept that foundation for our children’s schooling is directly disobedient to God’s Word. Think of the implications of moral neutrality: Lying is as legitimate as truth, theft as honesty, treason as patriotism, adultery as faithfulness, homosexuality as heterosexuality.

          Yet, as Throckmorton implies, moral neutrality is the best that we can hope for in government schools.

          Christian parents truly concerned about the eternal welfare of their children have no alternative beyond (1) home schooling them or (2) sending them to a truly Christian private school which they have carefully checked out in advance.

          And our churches need to found many more such Christian schools. The last figure I saw was that there are only some 800 schools sponsored by SBC churches. Over 43,000 churches and just 800 schools. Granted most of our churches are small, but four or five churches could pool resources to fund a school. Perhaps a practical goal would be 8,000 Southern Baptist schools by 2015.

          In any event, we Southern Baptists, both lay and clergy, need to wake up to the truth that sending our children to government schools enormously increases the likelihood that they will spend eternity in hell. TCP]